Skip to content

Cursor alternative for enterprise teams

More coding power. No editor migration.

Cursor is strong as an integrated AI IDE. Lurus Code is for teams that want to keep VS Code and the CLI, contract with a German company, and avoid seat fees.

0€ per team member · German contracting party · product-wide ZDR

Request a demo for your team Start your team now
Review pricing → Open Trust Center →

Three perspectives. One defensible decision.

01

Engineering

Keep the workflow, not a new editor

Lurus Code works in VS Code and the CLI with a traceable flow from context to verification.

Real product stage and a bounded pilot using a representative workflow.

02

Security & privacy

Product-wide guarantees from a German contracting party

Zero Data Retention and no-training apply across offered routes; provider and region are disclosed per route.

Public DPA, Trust Center, and dated claims.

03

Procurement & finance

0€ per team member

No seat, license, or team base fee. You pay for actual usage from the shared team balance.

Per-member budgets and a flexible team balance.

Which approach fits your organization?

Lurus Code extends your existing engineering workflow with German procurement and no seat fee.

Lurus Code is the better fit when …

  • Your team wants to keep VS Code and the CLI.
  • German contracting and public review documents matter.
  • You do not want to pay for provisioned but inactive accounts.

Lurus Code also stands out with …

  • Your existing VS Code and CLI workflow stays intact.
  • Product-wide ZDR and no-training provide one consistent trust baseline.
  • A German contracting party simplifies privacy review and procurement.

Lurus Code supports your team with …

  • Agentic multi-file changes
  • Code review, background agents, and MCP support
  • Central team balances and individual member budgets

Real product evidence

Visible from context through verification.

Lurus Code agentic workflow in VS Code

Decision matrix

Strengths and trade-offs, not winner scoring.

Workflow and adoption

Environment

Lurus Code · Strength

Keep VS Code and the CLI

Cursor · Strength

Integrated VS Code-based AI IDE

Tab completion

Lurus Code · Not offered

Focused on agentic workflows

Cursor · Strength

Specialized Tab completion

Team economics

Access cost

Lurus Code · Strength

0€ per team member

Cursor · Trade-off

Teams priced per user

Cost controls

Lurus Code · Strength

Shared team balance and per-member budgets

Cursor · Strength

Included usage and admin limits

Security and administration

Privacy mode

Lurus Code · Strength

Product-wide ZDR and no-training

Cursor · Plan-dependent

Privacy Mode with documented scope

Identity and provisioning

Lurus Code · Not offered

Not represented as an SSO/SCIM offering

Cursor · Strength

SSO and SCIM in team/enterprise offers

Team economics

0€ per team member.

No seat, license, or team base fee. Your organization provides a shared team balance and only actual model and AI feature usage is deducted.

Request a demo for your team

Cursor: current cost structure

Cursor publishes per-user Teams pricing and offers Enterprise on custom terms. Pricing and included usage may change; refer to the linked pricing page.

Security, privacy, and procurement

Verifiable guarantees instead of blanket promises.

Lurus Code processes source code and request context with Zero Data Retention.

Context required for a request is transmitted solely for processing and is not retained after processing is complete.

Customer data and source code are not used to train AI models.

The no-training guarantee applies to Lurus and every model provider connected through Lurus Code.

Zero Data Retention applies by default to every model and provider route.

Model, provider, and processing region are disclosed transparently for each route without limiting the Zero Data Retention guarantee.

Cursor: documented scope

With Privacy Mode enabled, Cursor documents no-training and ZDR agreements with model providers. Certain models, opt-ins, and abuse reviews have their own scope.

Open Trust Center →Review DPA →
Request a demo for your team

Bounded pilot

Evaluate Lurus on a real workflow

Choose a representative task, frame quality, data, and budget guardrails, then deliberately decide the next step.

  1. 01

    Choose a representative workflow

  2. 02

    Frame quality, data, and budget guardrails

  3. 03

    Deliberately decide the next step

Frequently asked questions

How quickly can our team evaluate Lurus Code? +

Start with a bounded pilot and one representative workflow. Your team keeps VS Code and the CLI, so Lurus Code can be evaluated without a fundamental editor migration.

Which AI models can our teams use? +

Lurus Code supports a provider-spanning workflow. Admins centrally define which available AI models the team may use.

How does Lurus Code protect our source code? +

Zero Data Retention and no-training apply product-wide. Provider and processing region are disclosed per route, and a public DPA supports review before adoption.

How does 0€ per team member work? +

There is no seat, license, or team base fee. Your organization provides a shared team balance and only actual model and AI feature usage is deducted.

How do admins control cost and usage? +

Admins manage the shared team balance, assign per-member budgets, and centrally define which AI models may be used.

Make the decision using a real workflow.

No rollout obligation: we will frame product fit, data paths, and cost for your concrete use case.

Request a demo for your teamStart your team now

Continue evaluating

Lurus Code for enterprise → Lurus Code vs Claude Code → Lurus Code vs Codex →