Your code is never stored. Processing exclusively in EU data centers. GDPR-compliant.
View our security standardsAI Test Generation & TDD
Generate unit tests automatically, run TDD red-green-refactor cycles, and integrate AI testing into CI pipelines. GDPR-compliant.
Test Generation
`/test` generates tests for any file.
TDD Mode
`/tdd` for test-driven development cycles.
TDD Implement
Write code to pass failing tests.
Auto-Test
Run tests automatically after AI changes.
Test Agent
Dedicated test-generator agent with tools.
CI Integration
`lurus test` in CI pipelines.
Test Generation in Practice
Point the agent at any file and ask for tests. It reads the implementation, identifies all exported functions, detects existing test patterns, and generates complete test suites — including edge cases and mocks.
TDD Workflow: Red → Green → Refactor
The AI follows the classic TDD cycle. Start with /tdd <feature> and the agent writes failing tests first, then the minimal implementation, then cleans up.
Write Failing Tests
The agent writes tests that define the expected behavior. All tests fail because no implementation exists yet — this is correct.
Minimal Implementation
Write the smallest possible code to make all tests pass. No over-engineering, no speculative features.
Improve Quality
Clean up the code, remove duplication, improve names — without changing behavior. Tests keep you safe.
TDD Guard
Keep your team on track with TDD Guard. It monitors every code change and warns (or blocks) if production code is written without a corresponding test.
/tdd onWarn mode — alerts when code is written without a test/tdd strictStrict mode — blocks code changes without corresponding tests/tdd offDisable TDD Guard/tdd-implementImplement code for existing failing testsCI Integration
Combine test generation with code review in your CI pipeline for a full automated quality gate.
/testRun full test suitelurus code-review-ciReview only changed files--fail-on highFail build on high severity findings--pr-commentsPost findings as inline PR commentsAI testing vs manual testing
AI test generation complements manual testing — it handles the repetitive work so you can focus on edge cases and business logic.
| Aspect | AI Test Generation | Manual Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Seconds per file | Minutes to hours |
| Consistency | Same coverage every time | Varies by developer |
| Edge cases | Pattern-based detection | Requires experience |
| Business logic | Limited understanding | Full context |
| Mocking | Auto-generates mocks | Manual setup |
| Maintenance | Regenerate on changes | Manual updates |
Frequently asked questions
What testing frameworks does Lurus Code support?
Does AI-generated testing replace manual testing?
How accurate are the generated tests?
Can I use this for TDD in a team?
Is my test code sent to external servers?
Automate your testing
From unit tests to full TDD cycles — ship code that works the first time.
Get started